Laminated roof shingle



FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a first embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a first embodiment.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a second embodiment.

FIG. 4 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a second embodiment.

FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a third embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a third embodiment.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a fourth embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a fourth embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a fifth embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a fifth embodiment. FIG. 11 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a sixth embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a sixth embodiment.

FIG. 13 is a perspective view of a laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a seventh embodiment; and,

FIG. 14 is a top plan view of the laminated roof shingle showing my new design according to a seventh embodiment.

The bottom and the four sides of the laminated roof shingle, shown in broken lines, are unornamented and form no part of the claimed design. The laminated roof shingle is of conventional thickness, exaggerated in the perspective views for ease of illustration.

The hatched areas in the figures indicate granular surfaces of contrasting appearance. My ornamental design is formed with a first granular surface that contrasts with a second adjacent granular surface on the same level and a third adjacent granular surface that is recessed. Each of the three granular surfaces are visually distinct from one another.

The remaining broken lines in the figures show a portion of the laminated roof shingle that is covered and not visible when the laminated roof shingle is used normally as part of a roof covering and forms no part of the claimed design. 

CLAIM I claim the ornamental design for a laminated roof shingle, as shown and described. 